PTSD rates dropped 3 years postwar and rose again 17 years later; 23% of veterans without combat stress reaction reported delayed PTSD.

 
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;163(4):659-66.
Related Articles, Links
Click here to read 
Trajectories of PTSD: a 20-year longitudinal study.

Solomon Z, Mikulincer M.

Bob Shappel School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. solomon@post.tau.ac.il

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the psychopathological effects of combat in veterans with and without combat stress reaction. METHOD: Veterans (N=214) from the 1982 Lebanon War were assessed in a prospective longitudinal design: 131 suffered from combat stress reaction during the war, and 83 did not. They were evaluated 1, 2, 3, and 20 years after the war. RESULTS: Combat stress reaction is an important vulnerability marker. Veterans with combat stress reaction were 6.6 times more likely to endorse posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at all four measurements, their PTSD was more severe, and they were at increased risk for exacerbation/reactivation. A qualitative analysis of the profile of PTSD symptoms revealed some time-related changes in the symptom configuration of veterans who did not suffer from combat stress reaction. In both groups, the course fluctuated; PTSD rates dropped 3 years postwar and rose again 17 years later; 23% of veterans without combat stress reaction reported delayed PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the detrimental effects of combat are deep and enduring and follow a complex course, especially in combat stress reaction casualties. The implications of aging and ongoing terror in impeding recovery from the psychological wounds of war are discussed.

Publication Types:

PMID: 16585441 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Posted in News | Tagged |

Dissociative disorders were highly prevalent in this clinical population and typically had not been previously diagnosed clinically.

 
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;163(4):623-9. Related Articles, Links
Click here to read 
Comment in:

Prevalence of dissociative disorders in psychiatric outpatients.

Foote B, Smolin Y, Kaplan M, Legatt ME, Lipschitz D.

Klau-1 Psychiatric Outpatient Department, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E. 210th St., Bronx, NY 10467, USA. jbfoote@aol.com

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the prevalence of DSM-IV dissociative disorders in an inner-city outpatient psychiatric population. METHOD: Subjects were 231 consecutive admissions (84 men and 147 women, mean age=37 years) to an inner-city, hospital-based outpatient psychiatric clinic. The subjects completed self-report measures of dissociation (Dissociative Experiences Scale) and trauma history (Traumatic Experiences Questionnaire). Eighty-two patients (35%) completed a structured interview for dissociative disorders (Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule). RESULTS: The 82 patients who were interviewed did not differ significantly on any demographic measure or on the self-report measures of trauma and dissociation from the 149 patients who were not interviewed. Twenty-four (29%) of the 82 interviewed patients received a diagnosis of a dissociative disorder. Dissociative identity disorder was diagnosed in five (6%) patients. Compared to the patients without a dissociative disorder diagnosis, patients with a dissociative disorder were significantly more likely to report childhood physical abuse (71% versus 27%) and childhood sexual abuse (74% versus 29%), but the two groups did not differ significantly on any demographic measure, including gender. Chart review revealed that only four (5%) patients in whom a dissociative disorder was identified during the study had previously received a dissociative disorder diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Dissociative disorders were highly prevalent in this clinical population and typically had not been previously diagnosed clinically. The high prevalence of dissociative disorders found in this study may be related to methodological factors (all patients were offered an interview rather than only those who had scored high on a screening self-report measure) and epidemiological factors (extremely high prevalence rates for childhood physical and sexual abuse were present in the overall study population).

Publication Types:

PMID: 16585436 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Posted in Psychiatry/Neurology | Tagged |

Safety and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with epilepsy: a review of the literature.

 
: Epilepsy Behav. 2007 May 8; [Epub ahead of print] Related Articles
Safety and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with epilepsy: a review of the literature.

Bae EH, Schrader LM, Machii K, Alonso-Alonso M, Riviello JJ Jr, Pascual-Leone A, Rotenberg A.

Department of Neurology, Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is emerging as a new therapeutic tool in epilepsy, where it can be used to suppress seizures or treat comorbid conditions such as mood disorder. However, as rTMS carries a risk of inducing seizures among other adverse events, its safety and tolerability in the population with epilepsy warrant distinct consideration, as this group is especially seizure-prone. Accordingly, we performed a review of the literature to estimate the risk of seizures and other adverse events associated with rTMS in patients with epilepsy. We performed an English-language literature search, and reviewed all studies published from January 1990 to February 2007 in which patients with epilepsy were treated with rTMS, and complemented the literature search with personal correspondence with authors when necessary. We identified 30 publications that described patients with epilepsy who underwent rTMS, and noted total number of relevant subjects, medication usage, incidence of adverse events, and rTMS parameters including stimulus frequency, number of stimuli, train duration, intertrain interval, coil type, and stimulation sites. The data were analyzed for adverse events related to rTMS. Crude per-subject risk, as well as per-subject mean risk weighted by sample size and risk per 1000 stimuli weighted by number of stimuli in each study, were computed for seizures and for other adverse events. Adverse events or lack thereof was reported in 26 studies (n=280 subjects). Adverse events attributed to rTMS were generally mild and occurred in 17.1% of subjects. Headache was most common, occurring in 9.6%. The most serious adverse event was seizure during treatment, which occurred in four patients (1.4% crude per-subject risk). All but one case were the patients’ typical seizures with respect to duration and semiology, and were associated with low-frequency rTMS. A single case of an atypical seizure appearing to arise from the region of stimulation during high-frequency rTMS is reported. No rTMS-related episodes of status epilepticus were reported. We cautiously conclude that the risk of seizure in patients with epilepsy undergoing rTMS is small, and the risk of other mild adverse events is comparable to that seen when rTMS is used to treat other diseases. Status epilepticus or life-threatening seizures have not been reported in patients undergoing rTMS treatment. rTMS thus appears to be nearly as safe in patients with epilepsy as in nonepileptic individuals, and warrants further investigation as a therapy in this population.

PMID: 17493877 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Posted in Psychiatry/Neurology |

The neurobiological dimension of meditation–results from neuroimaging studies

 
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2006 Dec;56(12):488-92. Related Articles, Links
Click here to read 
[The neurobiological dimension of meditation–results from neuroimaging studies]

[Article in German]

Neumann NU, Frasch K.

Klinik fur Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik am Bezirkskrankenhaus Gunzburg, Abt. Psychiatrie II der Universitat Ulm.

Meditation in general can be understood as a state of complete and unintentional silent and motionless concentration on an activity, an item or an idea. Subjectively, meditative experience is said to be fundamentally different from “normal” mental states and is characterized by terms like timelessness, boundlessness and lack of self-experience. In recent years, several fMRI- and PET-studies about meditation which are presented in this paper have been published. Due to different methods, especially different meditation types, the results are hardly comparable. Nevertheless, the data suggest the hypothesis of a “special” neural activity during meditative states being different from that during calm alertness. Main findings were increased activation in frontal, prefrontal and cingulate areas which may represent the mental state of altered self-experience. In the present studies, a considerable lack of scientific standards has to be stated making it of just casuistic value. Today’s improved neurobiological examination methods – especially neuroimaging techniques – may contribute to enlighten the phenomenon of qualitatively different states of consciousness.

Publication Types:

PMID: 17160792 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Posted in Psychiatry/Neurology |

Listening to Turkish classical music decreases patients’ anxiety, pain, dissatisfaction and the dose of sedative and analgesic drugs during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec 14;12(46):7532-6. Related Articles,Links

Click here to read
Listening to Turkish classical music decreases patients’ anxiety, pain, dissatisfaction and the dose of sedative and analgesic drugs during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Ovayolu N, Ucan O, Pehlivan S, Pehlivan Y, Buyukhatipoglu H, Savas MC, Gulsen MT.

Gaziantep University, School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, 27310 Gaziantep, Turkey.

AIM: To determine whether listening to music decreases the requirement for dosages of sedative drugs, patients’ anxiety, pain and dissatisfaction feelings during colonoscopy and makes the procedure more comfortable and acceptable. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy between October 2005 and February 2006 were randomized into either listening to music (Group 1, n = 30) or not listening to music (Group 2, n = 30). Anxiolytic and analgesic drugs (intravenous midazolam and meperidine) were given according to the patients’ demand. Administered medications were monitored. We determined their levels of anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Test form. Patients’ satisfaction, pain, and willingness to undergo a repeated procedure were self-assessed using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: The mean dose of sedative and analgesic drugs used in group 1 (midazolam: 2.1 +/- 1.4, meperidine: 18.1 +/- 11.7) was smaller than group 2 (midazolam: 2.4 +/- 1.0, meperidine: 20.6 +/- 11.5), but without a significant difference (P > 0.05). The mean anxiety level in group 1 was lower than group 2 (36.7 +/- 2.2 vs 251.0 +/- 1.9, P < 0.001). The mean satisfaction score was higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (87.8 +/- 3.1 vs 58.1 +/- 3.4, P < 0.001). The mean pain score in group 1 was lower than group 2 (74.1 +/- 4.7 vs 39.0 +/- 3.9, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Listening to music during colonoscopy helps reduce the dose of sedative medications, as well as patients’ anxiety, pain, dissatisfaction during the procedure. Therefore, we believe that listening to music can play an adjunctive role to sedation in colonoscopy. It is a simple, inexpensive way to improve patients’ comfort during the procedure.

Publication Types:

PMID: 17167846 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Posted in Psychiatry/Neurology | Tagged |