See previous post. Dr Kelsey saved tens of thousands of children in the U.S. and Canada from the greatest ever anti-anxiety medication (until it wasn’t) synthesized in Germany.
PS I remember the time when the surviving amelic/phocomelic children, then in their teenager years were a common sight in Germany. The wikipedia page is informative:
Frances Kathleen Oldham KelseyCM (née Oldham; July 24, 1914 – August 7, 2015) was a Canadian-American[1]pharmacologist and physician. As a reviewer for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), she refused to authorize thalidomide for market because she had concerns about the lack of evidence regarding the drug’s safety.[2] Her concerns proved to be justified when it was shown that thalidomide caused serious birth defects. Kelsey’s career intersected with the passage of laws strengthening FDA oversight of pharmaceuticals. Kelsey was the second woman to receive the President’s Award for Distinguished Federal Civilian Service, awarded to her by John F. Kennedy in 1962.
Born in Cobble Hill, British Columbia,[3] Kelsey attended St. Margaret’s School from 1928 to 1931 in the provincial capital, graduating at age 15.[4] From 1930 to 1931, she attended Victoria College (now University of Victoria). She then enrolled at McGill University, where she received both a B.Sc. (1934) and an M.Sc. (1935) in pharmacology.[3] Encouraged by one of her professors, she “wrote to EMK Geiling, M.D., a noted researcher [who] was starting up a new pharmacology department at the University of Chicago, asking for a position doing graduate work”.[4] Geiling, unaware of spelling conventions with respect to Francis and Frances, presumed that Frances was a man and offered her the position, which she accepted, starting work in 1936.[5][6]
Upon completing her Ph.D., Oldham joined the University of Chicago faculty. In 1942, like many other pharmacologists, Oldham was looking for a synthetic cure for malaria. As a result of these studies, Oldham learned that some drugs are able to pass through the placental barrier.[8] During her work, she also met fellow faculty member Fremont Ellis Kelsey, whom she married in 1943.[4]
While on the faculty at the University of Chicago, Kelsey was awarded her M.D. in 1950.[4] She supplemented her teaching with work as an editorial associate for the American Medical AssociationJournal for two years. Kelsey left the University of Chicago in 1954, decided to take a position teaching pharmacology at the University of South Dakota, and moved with her husband and two daughters to Vermillion, South Dakota, where she taught until 1957.[3]
She became a dual citizen of Canada and the United States in the 1950s in order to continue practicing medicine in the U.S., but retained strong ties to Canada where she continued to visit her siblings regularly until late in life.[2]
In 1960, Kelsey was hired by the FDA in Washington, D.C. At that time, she “was one of only seven full-time and four young part-time physicians reviewing drugs”[4] for the FDA. One of her first assignments at the FDA was to review an application by Richardson-Merrell for the drug thalidomide (under the tradename Kevadon) as a tranquilizer and painkiller with specific indications to prescribe the drug to pregnant women for morning sickness. Although it had been previously approved in Canada and more than 20 European and African countries,[9] she withheld approval for the drug and requested further studies.[3] Despite pressure from thalidomide’s manufacturer Grünenthal, Kelsey persisted in requesting additional information to explain observations by Leslie Florence of neurological symptoms published in the British Medical Journal in December 1960.[4][10] She also requested data showing the drug was not harmful to the fetus.[10]
Kelsey’s insistence that the drug should be fully tested prior to approval was vindicated when the births of deformed infants in Europe were linked to thalidomide ingestion by their mothers during pregnancy.[11][12] Researchers discovered that the thalidomide crossed the placental barrier and caused serious birth defects.[8] She was hailed on the front page of The Washington Post as a heroine[13] for averting a similar tragedy in the U.S.[14]Morton Mintz, author of The Washington Post article, said “[Kelsey] prevented … the birth of hundreds or indeed thousands of armless and legless children.”[13] Kelsey insisted that her assistants, Oyama Jiro and Lee Geismar, as well as her FDA superiors who backed her strong stance, deserved credit as well. The narrative of Kelsey’s persistence was used to help pass rigorous drug approval regulation in 1962.[1]
After Mintz broke the story in July 1962, there was a substantial public outcry. The Kefauver Harris Amendment was passed unanimously by Congress in October 1962 to strengthen drug regulation.[11][12] Companies were required to demonstrate the efficacy of new drugs, report adverse reactions to the FDA, and request consent from patients participating in clinical studies.[15] The drug testing reforms required “stricter limits on the testing and distribution of new drugs”[8] to avoid similar problems. The amendments, for the first time, also recognized that “effectiveness [should be] required to be established prior to marketing.”[11][12]
As a result of her blocking American approval of thalidomide, Kelsey was awarded the President’s Award for Distinguished Federal Civilian Service by John F. Kennedy on August 7, 1962,[16] becoming the second woman so honoured.[17] After receiving the award, Kelsey continued her work at the FDA. There, she played a key role in shaping and enforcing the 1962 amendments.[14] She also became responsible for directing the surveillance of drug testing at the FDA.[3]
Kelsey retired from the FDA in 2005, at age 90, after 45 years of service.[9] In 2010, the FDA named the Kelsey Award for her, to be awarded annually to an FDA employee for “Excellence and Courage in Protecting Public Health”.[18]
In 2010, the FDA presented Kelsey with the first Drug Safety Excellence Award and named the annual award after her,[20] announcing that it would be given to one FDA staff member annually.[21] In announcing the awards, Center Director Steven K. Galson said: “I am very pleased to have established the Dr. Frances O. Kelsey Drug Safety Excellence Award and to recognize the first recipients for their outstanding accomplishments in this important aspect of drug regulation.”[22]
Kelsey turned 100 in July 2014,[23] and shortly thereafter, in the fall of 2014, she moved from Washington, D.C., to live with her daughter in London, Ontario.[24] In June 2015, when she was named to the Order of Canada, Mercédes Benegbi, a thalidomide victim and the head of the Thalidomide Victims Association of Canada, praised Kelsey for showing strength and courage by refusing to bend to pressure from drug company officials, and said “To us, she was always our heroine, even if what she did was in another country.”[24]
Kelsey died in London, Ontario, on August 7, 2015, at the age of 101,[25] less than 24 hours after Ontario’s Lieutenant-Governor, Elizabeth Dowdeswell, visited her home to present her with the insignia of Member of the Order of Canada for her role against thalidomide.[26]
^“When Kelsey read Geiling’s letter offering her a research assistantship and scholarship in the PhD program at Chicago, she was delighted. But there was one slight problem — one that ‘tweaked her conscience a bit.’ The letter began ‘Dear Mr. Oldham,’ Oldham being her maiden name. Kelsey asked her professor at McGill if she should wire back and explain that Frances with an ‘e’ is female. ‘Don’t be ridiculous,’ he said. ‘Accept the job, sign your name, put ‘Miss’ in brackets afterwards, and go!'” Bren (2001).
Kelsey, Frances O. (1993), Autobiographical Reflections(PDF). This was drawn from oral history interviews conducted in 1974, 1991, and 1992; presentation, Founder’s Day, St. Margaret’s School, Duncan, B. C., 1987; and presentation, groundbreaking, Frances Kelsey School, Mill Bay, B. C., 1993.
McGovern, James (2020), “Quieter Things: The Tale of Frances Oldham Kelsey”, Boulevard, 35 (2 & 3): 209–219.
Mintz, Morton (1965), The therapeutic nightmare; a report on the roles of the United States Food and Drug Administration, the American Medical Association, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and others in connection with the irrational and massive use of prescription drugs that may be worthless, injurious, or even lethal., Boston: Houghton Mifflin, LCCN65015156. Library of Congress catalog entry.
McFadyen, R. E. (1976), “Thalidomide in America: A Brush With Tragedy”, Clio Medica, 11 (2): 79–93, PMID61093.
Mulliken, J. (August 10, 1962), “A Woman Doctor Who Would Not be Hurried”, Life, vol. 53, pp. 28–9, LCCN37008367.
Bra cup size and handedness were studied as possible risk factors for breast cancer. Data for 3918 cases and 11,712 controls from 7 centres were used to examine the association of handedness with laterality of breast cancer; data for 2325 cases and 7008 controls from 4 centres were used to assess the relation of bra cup size to breast cancer risk. There was a suggestive (P about 0.10) association of handedness with breast cancer laterality: odds ratio of a left-handed (or ambidextrous) woman having a left-sided cancer 1.22 (95% CI 0.96-1.56). Handedness may affect the lateral occurrence of breast cancer, although this tumour is in general more common in the left breast, possibly because this breast is usually slightly larger. Premenopausal women who do not wear bras had half the risk of breast cancer compared with bra users (P about 0.09), possibly because they are thinner and likely to have smaller breasts. Among bra users, larger cup size was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (P about 0.026), although the association was found only among postmenopausal women and was accounted for, in part, by obesity. These data suggest that bra cup size (and conceivably mammary gland size) may be a risk factor for breast cancer.
Objective: To screen high-risk population of breast cancer by analyzing the risk factors of breast cancer in Guangdong Province.
Methods: A case-control study was performed to identify the risk factors of breast cancer between premenopausal women and postmenopausal women. Chi-square test and unconditional logistic regression were used to analyze the data.
Results: In premenopausal women, prophylactic, family history of breast cancer, bad mood, bad life incidence and work load were the risk factors, and breast hyperplasia history, breast tissue examination history, regular exercise and sleeping without bra were the protective factors. In postmenopausal women, family history of breast cancer was the risk factor, and breast hyperplasia history and mood adjustment were the protective factors.
Conclusion: The risk and protective factors of breast cancer differ between premenopausal and postmenopausal women, which highlights the importance of using different risk models to screen the high-risk populations.
Background: The evidence of an association of lactation with a reduction in the risk of breast cancer among women has been limited and inconsistent. The effect of lactation appears to be confined to premenopausal women with a history of long lactation, but most studies of this relation have been limited in statistical power. We conducted a multicenter, population-based, case-control study with a sample large enough for us to describe more precisely the association between lactation and the risk of breast cancer.
Methods: Patients less than 75 years old who had breast cancer were identified from statewide tumor registries in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire. Controls were randomly selected from lists of licensed drivers if the case subjects were less than 65 years old, and from lists of Medicare beneficiaries if they were 65 through 74 years old. Information on lactation, reproductive history, and family and medical history was obtained by means of telephone interviews. After the exclusion of nulliparous women, 5878 case subjects and 8216 controls remained for analysis.
Results: After adjustment for parity, age at first delivery, and other risk factors for breast cancer, lactation was associated with a slight reduction in the risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women, as compared with the risk among women who were parous but had never lactated (relative risk, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.91); the relative risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women who had lactated, as compared with those who had not, was 1.04 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.14). With an increasing cumulative duration of lactation, there was a decreasing risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women (P for trend < 0.001) but not among postmenopausal, parous women (P for trend = 0.51). A younger age at first lactation was significantly associated with a reduction in the risk of premenopausal breast cancer (P for trend = 0.003). As compared with parous women who did not lactate, the relative risk of breast cancer among women who first lactated at less than 20 years of age and breast-fed their infants for a total of six months was 0.54 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.82).
Conclusions: There is a reduction in the risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women who have lactated. No reduction in the risk of breast cancer occurred among postmenopausal women with a history of lactation.
Karim S, Malik IR, Nazeer Q, Zaheer A, Farooq M, Mahmood N, Malik A, Asif M, Mehmood A, Khan AR, Jabbar A, Arshad M, Yousafi Q, Hussain A, Mirza Z, Iqbal MA, Rasool M.Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 Sep;26(6):1123-1128. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 2.PMID: 31516339Free PMC article.
Maurice Preter, MD is a European and U.S. educated psychiatrist, psychotherapist, psychopharmacologist, neurologist, and medical-legal expert in private practice in Manhattan. He is also the principal of Fifth Avenue Concierge Medicine, PLLC, a medical concierge service and health advisory for select individuals and families.